My
last two posts made a lot of my readers angry, but first and foremost, I want
to thank all of the readers who sent their comments to me. Some were supportive,
some… less supportive – but this is the beauty of our academic world. Recent
years have proven that no one can predict what will happen. No one predicted
that Bashar al-Assad would kill hundreds of Syrians every day for more than a
year and a half, and that no one would stop him. No one predicted the Arab
Spring and its outcome in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. We can express and exchange
opinions. You are more than welcome to post your comments here and have a
fertile discussion.
Thinking about Hezbollah as a separate
entity and not as a proxy army of Iran, and consequently forming a unique
strategy to combat it, seems to be a new concept that is hard to seize, but apparently
this concept is not mine alone. It seems that American intelligence agencies
decided to change their approach and refer the relationship between Iran and
Hezbollah as “strategic relationship” instead of labeling Hezbollah a “proxy
army.” They too understand that Hezbollah has grown into a full independent
creature with which the world has to cope individually.
Additionally,
the international community’s distrust of and discomfort with President
Mohammed Morsi is perfectly understandable. He is a man of Islam, and a member of
the Muslim Brotherhood, a religious movement that was repressed for many years
by Hosni Mubarak. Now, he and that movement are in power thanks to the first
democratic elections in Egypt whether we like it or not. To Western eyes it looks
that President Morsi poses a threat and it only seems natural that his next
ally will be Iran due to their common enemy: Israel. Though I greatly
appreciate concerns for Israel’s well being in the case of an Iranian-Egyptians
alliance, I believe that the odds of this kind of alliance are pretty slim.
The world of terrorism and counter-terrorism
researchers tends to be pessimistic by nature. We search for the reasons for the
destruction of humanity, and unfortunately the majority of these reasons
currently invoke the name of Allah. Researchers are no different from the world
they live in, and the world in general has lost its faith in strong and
clear-intentioned Arab leaders. One should add that this lack of faith is not
without reason. And yet President Morsi, though Muslim, draws himself as a
different type of leader. Maybe we should give him a chance and leave our fears
aside. Maybe something good will happen – to Egypt and the region.
“Wouldn’t it be great if Hezbollah didn’t
have a huge arsenal of weapons;” “wouldn’t it be great if Hezbollah didn’t declare
of its intentions to attack Israel,” said a distinguished researcher in a
conference this week. He’s a pessimist too. I’m trying not to be.
Iran is in fact forced into a comprehensive but covert war and needs more independent strong allies at the moment. Well, President Assad was an ally but not a puppet of Iran, right? Considering ideological differences between the two, Assad's relationship with Iran was still strategic due to having a common enemy - Israel.
ReplyDeleteWhy cannot Morsi be an ally, given that he is an Islamist? Cannot Iran replace weak Assad with a rather strong Islamist Morsi and forge a mutually beneficial strategic alliance?
Plus: does not a war-torn (and not a stable) Syria provide a good context for Iran's influence? So, war in Syria is benefiting Iran and gives Islamic Republic the flexibility to turn its back to Assad and embrace Morsi, right?
Selling Assad and buying Morsi would be a good strategy because Iran would have influence in wart-torn Syria anyway.
The question is not what's in it for Iran - Iran needs President Morsi like air, I agree.
DeleteThe question is what's in it for President Morsi and Egypt. President Morsi wants President Assad to step down. Do you think Iran would give him that?
There might be a limit for Iran in supporting Assad. I do not know. If Morsi becomes so important to Iran's interest, then Iran might let Assad fall. The question is: can Morsi become more beneficial than Assad to Iran?
ReplyDelete